FILIPINO FAMILY FUND

 

Who We Are

Directors & Officers

Advisors

In the News

2010 Reception Photos

2009 Achievements

Philippine Abortion Study

Two Child Policy Proposed

Sign the Petition!

China's One Child Policy

Urgent Appeal

Your Fund at Work

Youth Values Education

Strengthen Family

Healthcare outreach

Future Leaders

Serve Trafficking Victims

Grant recipients

Ways to Give

CSR- Corporate Community

Join the Fund

Grants

Grant Application Form

Contact Us

An Analysis of the Estimated Figure of induced abortions in the Philippines in 2000
as published in a 2006 Guttmacher Institute report by Susheela Singh et al

By Dr. Roberto De Vera

 

 

Summary: In the 2006 Guttmacher Institute report "Unintended Pregnancies and Induced Abortions in the Philippines: Causes and Consequences", Susheela Singh et al estimated that there were 473,000 induced abortions completed in the Philippines in 2000 using a method consisting of three steps. First, based on reports gathered from 2,039 hospitals which contained the top ten leading causes of admission in the 1999-2001 period, they arrived at an estimate of the number of women in 2000 who were hospitalized due to complications from both induced and spontaneous abortions. Second, they calculated the number of women hospitalized for induced abortions by subtracting the estimated number of women hospitalized for spontaneous abortions (or miscarriages) from the estimated number of women hospitalized for induced and spontaneous abortions. Finally, they arrived at the estimated number of women who had induced abortions by multiplying the estimated number of women hospitalized for complications due to induced abortions by 6 to account for the women who had induced abortions who didn't go to the hospital.


We find that their method overestimates the figure of induced abortions in the Philippines in 2000 because of three flaws. These flaws had the effect of 1) overestimating the figure for women hospitalized for spontaneous and induced abortions due to an assumption that is weakly supported by statistical data; 2) underestimating the number of women hospitalized for complications due to spontaneous abortions (or miscarriages) because it mistakenly covers only those women with spontaneous abortions occurring in 12th to 22nd week of pregnancy who were hospitalized for complications; and 3) using a multiplier which most likely is higher than the ratio of the number of women who have induced abortions to the number of women who are hospitalized for complications due to induced abortions.

 

Using modified version of the Singh et al methodology (corrected to account for the above flaws), we arrived at an alternative estimate of 25,924 induced abortions in the Philippines in 2000 (1.3 abortions per 1,000 women in the reproductive age). Using a second method, we multiplied 0.0117, the share of induced abortions to live births by the number of live births in 2000, to arrive at second estimate of 20,831 induced abortions in the Philippines in 2000 (1.1 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age). We consider these two estimates of induced abortion in the Philippines in 2000 to be more reasonable than the 473,000 estimate (24.5 induced abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age) published in the 2006 Guttmacher Institute report.

In the 2006 Guttmacher Institute report "Unintended Pregnancies and Induced Abortions in the Philippines: Causes and Consequences", Susheela Singh et al estimated that there were 473,000 induced abortions completed in the Philippines in 2000 using a method [NOTE 1] consisting of three steps. First, based on reports gathered from 2,039 hospitals which contained the top ten leading causes of admission in the 1999-2001 period [NOTE 2], they summed up three figures (i.e. one estimate each for 1) 478 hospitals which had abortion as among the top ten leading causes of admission; 2) 1,180 hospitals which didn't have abortion as among the top ten leading causes of admission; 3) 381 hospitals without reports) to arrive at an estimate of the number of women in 2000 who were hospitalized due to complications from both induced and spontaneous abortions. Second, they calculated the number of women hospitalized for induced abortions by subtracting the estimated number of women hospitalized for spontaneous abortions (or miscarriages) from the estimated number of women hospitalized for induced and spontaneous abortions. Finally, they arrived at the estimated number of women who had induced abortions by multiplying the estimated number of women hospitalized for complications due to induced abortions by 6 to account for the women who had induced abortions who didn't go to the hospital. [NOTE 3]

 

We find that their method overestimates the figure of induced abortions in the Philippines in 2000 because of three flaws. First, the method overestimates the figure for women hospitalized for spontaneous and induced abortions due to an assumption that is weakly supported by statistical data. Its assumption for 1,180 out of 2,039 hospitals which didn't have abortion among the top ten leading causes for admissions--that the number of abortions was calculated to be 50% of the figure corresponding to the tenth leading cause of admissions--was based on data observed from a small sample of 6 hospitals in Northern Mindanao. [NOTE 4] Second, the method underestimates the number of women hospitalized for complications due to spontaneous abortions (or miscarriages) because it mistakenly covers only those women with spontaneous abortions occurring in 12th to 22nd week of pregnancy who were hospitalized for complications. Third, the method uses a multiplier which most likely is higher than the ratio of the number of women who have induced abortions to the number of women who are hospitalized for complications due to induced abortions. Based on a 1997 Susheela Singh et al that concluded that the national multiplier most likely is between 4 and 5, it seems more reasonable to use 4.5 as a multiplier instead 6 that was used. We used a modified version of the Singh et al methodology (corrected to account for the above flaws) to arrive at an estimated number of 25,924 induced abortions in the Philippines in 2000. [NOTE 5]

 

This estimate seems to be reasonable for it is relatively close to an estimate generated by a direct method consisting of two steps. First, based on the 1993 Philippine National Safe Motherhood Survey that estimated that 1% of all pregnancies end in induced abortion, we estimated that 1.17% of all live births end in an induced abortion. Second, we multiplied 0.0117 by the number of live births in 2000, 1,766,440 to arrive a second estimate of 20,831. [NOTE 6]

 

Summing up, due to several flaws in their methodology, Singh et al's figure of 473,000 induced abortions in the Philippines in 2000 (24.5 induced abortions per 1,000 women in reproductive age) grossly overestimates the actual figure. Using two methods, we think we have arrived at estimates of induced abortions in the Philippines in 2000: 25,924 and 20,831 (1.3 and 1.1 abortions per 1,000 women in the reproductive age, respectively) that are more reasonable that those published in the 2006 Singh et al report.

 

Table 1: Calculations for arriving at number of induced abortions in the Philippines in 2000 using the methodology found in 2006 Guttmacher report

 

Quick guide to calculations below: Note that abortions in categories a1, a2, a3 and b include both induced and spontaneous abortions. Thus, to arrive at the number of women hospitalized for induced abortion complications (d), we need to subtract the number of women hospitalized for spontaneous abortions (c) from the estimated number of women hospitalized for both induced and spontaneous abortions (b). The figure in (d) is multiplied by a multiplier that accounts for the women that may have had spontaneous and induced abortions that were not hospitalized for complications. This figure refers to the year 2000.

 

3 Methods in determining the number of women hospitalized for complications due to spontaneous and induced abortions

Estimated figure

a1 Method:   For the 478 hospitals in which abortion was one of the ten leading causes of admission, the number of women hospitalized for abortion complications was estimated directly from the hospital's information.

 

     71,837

a2 Method:   For the 1,180 hospitals in which abortion was not among the top ten causes of admission, they estimated the number of women hospitalized for abortion complications as one-half the figure of the tenth leading cause of admission since they argued that since abortion complications had different admission codes it was possible that these separate figures would be too small to reach the top ten.

  

     26,845

a3 Method:   For the 381 hospitals "whose basic characteristics were known, but for which there were no data on cause of discharge or no report was available", "[t]he likely number of abortion complications treated annually in these hospitals was estimated using regression analysis." The analysis was based on the number of abortions as the dependent variable and "ownership (public vs. private), hospital level (primary, secondary, or tertiary), hospital size (number of beds) and region (according to the 16-region classification)" as the dependent variables.

     

     6,311

b)  Estimated number of women with abortion (spontaneous and induced) with complications. (Add figures in a1, a2 and a3).

  

   104,993

 

 

   Less (or subtract from the above estimates)

 

c)    Number of women with spontaneous abortions hospitalized for complications.

     "An assumption was made that late spontaneous abortions (those occurring at 13-22 weeks) are likely to be accompanied by complications that will require hospital care. In the absence of induced abortion, these miscarriages account for 2.89% of all recognized pregnancies, and the ratio of spontaneous pregnancy losses to live births (which represent 84.8% of all observed pregnancies) is 3.41 per 100 (2.89/84.8)." After estimating the number of women with late pregnancy spontaneous abortions, they applied this to the percentage of women of had their baby delivered at a health facility at the regional level.

    

      26,092

d)    Estimated number of women with induced abortion hospitalized         for complications (Subtract the figure in c from the figure in b.)

    

    78,901

 

        e) Estimated number of women who have had induced abortions in  a year. (Multiply figure in d by the corresponding multiplier.)

       This was arrived at by applying a multiplier to 78,901. This multiplier is      arrived at by dividing 1 by the share of women who have had abortion who were hospitalized for complications.

 

 

multiplier  estimate

4         315,604

5         394,505

6         473,406

 

Table 2: Calculations for arriving at number of induced abortions in the Philippines in 2000 using 2006 Singh et al and modified methodology. (See Table 1 for details on categories below.)

 

 

3 Methods in determining the number of women hospitalized for complications due to spontaneous and induced abortions

Singh et al Method

Modified Method

       a1 Method:   For the 478 hospitals in which abortion was one of the ten leading causes of admission

 

     71,837

    

     71,837

       a2 Method:   For the 1,180 hospitals in which abortion was not among the top ten causes of admission

  

     26,845

 

     17,897(a)

       a3 Method:   For the 381 hospitals "whose basic characteristics were known, but for which there were no data on cause of discharge or no report was available".

     

      

       6,311

 

      

       6,311

       b)  Estimated number of women with abortion (spontaneous and induced) with complications. (Add figures in a1, a2 and a3).

  

   104,993

 

     96,045

 

       Less (or subtract from the above estimates)

 

 

       c) Number of women with spontaneous abortions hospitalized for complications.

    

    

      26,092

 

     90,284(b)

       d) Estimated number of women with induced abortion hospitalized for complications (Subtract the figure in c from the figure in b.)

    

      78,901

 

       5,761

 

       e) Multiplier

 

 

        6

 

        4.5(c)

       f) Estimated number of women who have had induced abortions in a year. (Multiply figure in d by the corresponding multiplier in e.)

 

 

 473,406

 

 

      25,924

 

Notes:

a)    First, for hospitals which did not include abortion as among the top ten causes for admission in their report, the method used to estimate the number of induced and spontaneous abortions (taken to be 50% of the number of admissions of the tenth cause) rests on an assumption (see explanation in a2 above) that was based on data gathered from a small sample of 6 hospitals in Northern Mindanao.  Quote: For six hospitals where abortion ranked below the 10th cause and for which data were available on both the 10th cause and the number of abortion patients, abortion complications accounted for about 60% of the total number of patients hospitalized for the 10th-ranking diagnosis (taken from a footnote on p. 101 of Singh S et al, Estimated the level of abortions in the Philippines and Bangladesh, International Family Planning Perspectives, 23(3), pp. 101-107 & 144, 1997).  We find that the correlation used to support their assumption was based on too small a sample--6 out of 2,039 hospitals. So it is reasonable to reduce the Guttenmacher Instutitute estimated figure of 26,845 by a third, or 17,897.

b)   Second, the figure calculated for women hospitalized for spontaneous abortion complications may have been underestimated because it was based on spontaneous abortions (or miscarriages) that occurred in the 13 to 22 weeks of pregnancy, and disregarded the spontaneous abortions that happened in the first 22 weeks, which is when most of them take place. Since "[s]tudies reveal that anywhere from 10-25% of all clinically recognized pregnancies will end in miscarriage" (taken from the American Pregnancy Association website at http://www.americanpregnancy.org/pregnancycomplications/miscarriage.html), in this case it would be reasonable to take 10% (the lower figure of the range) as the share of pregnancies that end in spontaneous abortions or miscarriages. This translates into 11.79% share of of spontaneous abortions (or miscarriages) to live births. By ratio and proportion, this translates into 90,284 (i.e. 26,092 times 11.79 divided 3.41) women hospitalized for complications due to spontaneous abortions (or miscarriages).

 

c) It should be emphasized that the 473,000 induced abortion figure was based on a multiplier value of 6 which covers the case for rural areas where women have poorer access to hospitals, when in fact the 1997 Singh et al paper mentioned that the multiplier applied to the nation would probably be between 4 and 5. So it would be reasonable to apply the multiplier 4.5 to the adjusted figure in d) of 5,761 in column of modified method, or 25,924 which is the new estimated figure for spontaneous and induced abortions done in year 2000.



NOTE 1. The discussion of the methodology is drawn from Appendix of Singh S, "Unintended Pregnancy and Induced Abortion in the Philippines", Guttmacher Institute, 2006, pp. 31-36. Unless pointed out otherwise, text in quotes are taken from the appendix of the 2006 report. This methodology is based mainly from Singh S. et al, Estimating the level of abortion in the Philippines and Bangladesh, International Family Planning Perspectives, 23(3), pp. 100-107 & 144, 1997.


NOTE 2.


Consideration 1.  The number of abortions were estimated using data gathered from 2,039 Philippine hospitals in 2003-2004, using the methodology of a 1994 paper.

Consideration  2.   Data gathering.   They gathered data for six years (1996-2001) including figures for the top ten leading causes of hospital admissions, but they only used the data for 1999-2001 "because data for these years are the most complete and most current.”

Consideration  3.  ...All estimates presented here are based on averaged data for these three years."


NOTE 3. See Table 1 for details of the calculation using Singh et al methodology.


NOTE 4. Quote: For six hospitals where abortion ranked below the 10th cause and for which data were available on both the 10th cause and the number of abortion patients, abortion complications accounted for about 60% of the total number of patients hospitalized for the 10th ranking diagnosis” (taken from a footnote on p. 101 of Singh S et al, Estimated the level of abortions in the Philippines and Bangladesh, International Family Planning Perspectives, 23(3), pp. 101-107 & 144, 1997).  We find that the correlation used to support their assumption was based on too small a sample--6 out of 2,039 hospitals.


NOTE 5. See Table 2 for details of the calculation using modified technology.


NOTE 6. Based on the 1993 Philippine National Safe Motherhood Survey, it was estimated that 1% of women who were pregnant had a successful induced abortion (See chapter seven of the report). As a share of live births, we estimate that 1.17% (i.e. 1/84.8 times 100%) of all live births ended in induced abortions. When we apply this share to the 1,766,440 live births in 2000 (taken from the National Statistics Office website at http://www.census.gov.ph/data/sectordata/2000/lb0001.htm), this alternative method estimates that there were 20,831 induced abortions in the year 2000.



 


FILIPINO FAMILY FUND: STRONG FAMILIES FOR A STRONG NATION